“Former Trump Adviser Peter Navarro Found Guilty of Contempt of Congress”

Spread the love

Peter Navarro Convicted of Contempt of Congress

Peter Navarro, a former trade adviser to Donald Trump, has been convicted of contempt of Congress for refusing to cooperate with an inquiry into the US Capitol riot. Prosecutors accused Navarro of acting “above the law” by ignoring a congressional subpoena related to the investigation. He now faces the possibility of up to a year in prison for each of the two contempt counts. This follows the conviction of another prominent Trump ally, former strategist Steve Bannon, who was found guilty of contempt of Congress last year.

Navarro Vows to Appeal to Supreme Court

Outside the court in Washington DC, Navarro expressed his disappointment, calling it a “sad day for America.” He declared his intention to appeal the verdict all the way to the Supreme Court. Navarro argued that this case marked the first time in US history that a senior White House adviser had been charged with such a crime. He contended that the Department of Justice had maintained a policy for over 50 years that prevented senior White House advisers from being compelled to testify before Congress.

Navarro’s Refusal to Comply with Subpoena

Navarro’s legal troubles began when he was served with a subpoena by a US House of Representatives select committee in February 2022. Despite the subpoena, he did not provide the requested emails or documents or testify before the Democratic-led panel. The committee had sought to question Navarro regarding efforts to delay the certification of the 2020 election. During the trial, prosecutors argued that Navarro had chosen loyalty to Trump over complying with the subpoena, characterizing this as contempt and a crime.

Navarro’s Legal Strategy and Executive Privilege Claim

Throughout the trial, Navarro’s lawyer, Stanley Woodward, presented little evidence and focused on discrediting the prosecutor’s case. Navarro had previously claimed that former President Trump instructed him to cite executive privilege when contacted by the committee. However, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that there was no evidence to support Navarro’s assertion that executive privilege justified his refusal to obey the committee’s summons.

Concerns about Escalation of Contempt Prosecutions

While contempt of Congress cases involving former or serving members of presidential administrations are not uncommon, the decision by the Justice Department to prosecute them is relatively rare. Some experts, like Bryan Lanza, a former Trump campaign adviser, express concerns about the escalation of such prosecutions, noting that it is not conducive to the US government’s functioning. Navarro’s lawyers are also motioning for a mistrial, alleging that jury members interacted with protesters during their deliberations. Navarro’s sentencing is scheduled for January, and he could face fines in addition to potential jail time.

Former Trump campaign strategist Steve Bannon, convicted of contempt of Congress in July 2022, received a four-month jail sentence. However, he remains free while his defense team appeals the conviction.


SOURCE: Ref Image from English Jagran

Views:1021 0
Website | + posts

Whether writing about complex technical topics or breaking news stories, my writing is always clear, concise, and engaging. My dedication to my craft and passion for storytelling have earned me a reputation as a highly respected article writer.


Spread the love