Legal Committee Seeks Inclusion in AI Group
The European Parliament’s Legal Affairs committee (JURI) is pushing to join the working group overseeing the implementation of the AI Act. This group, initially set to include only the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO) and Civil Liberties (LIBE) committees, has not yet been formalized, but JURI’s request could reshape its composition. This move signals JURI’s interest in playing a more active role in AI regulation.
Next Steps for Inclusion
The final composition of the AI working group could be decided at the next IMCO committee meeting, scheduled for October 14. Italian lawmaker Brando Benifei, a co-rapporteur of the AI Act in the previous legislature, confirmed that the group is expected to begin its work by mid-October. If successful, JURI will join the critical discussions on how the AI Act is implemented and monitored.
The AI Act: A New Regulatory Framework
The AI Act, which officially came into force in August, is designed to regulate AI systems based on the risks they pose to society. General-purpose AI rules will be applied in a year, while regulations for high-risk systems will take effect in three years. The goal is to ensure AI technology is developed and used responsibly across Europe, balancing innovation with safety.
Parallels with Past Laws
The AI working group mirrors similar groups established during the European Parliament’s previous mandate. For example, the Digital Services Act (DSA) and the Digital Markets Act (DMA) had comparable oversight bodies. These groups typically consist of rapporteurs from the relevant committees and focus on law implementation, scrutinizing delegated acts and inviting industry experts to contribute.
Potential Key Members of the AI Group
The AI Act working group could feature prominent lawmakers like Brando Benifei, Axel Voss from Germany’s EPP party, and Alexandra Geese of the Greens-EFA. These members were involved in drafting the AI Act and are expected to play significant roles in its oversight. Their expertise will be crucial in ensuring the Act is implemented effectively.
Focus on Oversight and Development
These working groups play a critical role in monitoring the implementation of laws, including the AI Act. They scrutinize legal aspects, analyze delegated acts, and hold discussions with representatives from the European Commission and industry. While many of their meetings are private, some will be held publicly during regular committee sessions, ensuring a degree of transparency.
AI Act Origins and Committee Rivalry
The AI Act has been a contentious issue since it was first proposed by the European Commission in 2021. Various Parliamentary committees vied for control over shaping the legislation, leading to a joint effort between the IMCO and LIBE committees. This collaborative approach, co-led by Benifei and Dragos Tudorache, allowed for a more coordinated response to the growing concerns surrounding AI technology.
Preparing for Future AI Challenges
In response to the new AI Act, the European Commission is also preparing revisions to several existing regulations, such as those related to medical devices. These updates aim to align current rules with the emerging AI framework. The inclusion of JURI in the AI working group would ensure a broader legal perspective, potentially improving the Act’s long-term effectiveness.
SOURCE: Ref Image from Euractiv
Whether writing about complex technical topics or breaking news stories, my writing is always clear, concise, and engaging. My dedication to my craft and passion for storytelling have earned me a reputation as a highly respected article writer.